XBFR vs. PMAP
XBFR (Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF) and PMAP (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XBFR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMAP.
Performance
XBFR vs. PMAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBFR
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMAP
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- 7.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBFR vs. PMAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBFR Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 4.18% |
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April | 2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBFR and PMAP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBFR vs. PMAP — Risk / Return Rank
XBFR
PMAP
XBFR vs. PMAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBFR | PMAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 3.15 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
XBFR vs. PMAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBFR drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, which is greater than PMAP's maximum drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBFR and PMAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBFR | PMAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -1.75% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.13% | -0.20% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -0.08% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility
XBFR vs. PMAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBFR | PMAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.00% | 1.17% | +6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.00% | 2.33% | +5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.00% | 2.33% | +5.67% |
XBFR vs. PMAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PMAP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBFR vs. PMAP - Dividend Comparison
XBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while PMAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% |
XBFR Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBFR and PMAP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PMAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBFR.
XBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for PMAP.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBFR and 0.50% for PMAP.
Find the right allocation for XBFR and PMAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer