XBFR vs. LOUP
XBFR (Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBFR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. XBFR is actively managed, while LOUP is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XBFR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.
Performance
XBFR vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBFR
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LOUP
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -11.40%
- 6M
- 9.89%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 1Y
- 37.12%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $926.73K | $920.97K | $1.38M | |
| $260.31K | $267.77K | $415.44K |
XBFR vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBFR Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 5.51% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 14.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBFR and LOUP is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBFR vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
XBFR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LOUP
XBFR vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBFR | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBFR vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBFR drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBFR and LOUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBFR | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -58.68% | +54.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -14.75% | +13.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -19.79% | +18.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.09% | — |
Volatility
XBFR vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBFR | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.13% | 31.22% | -22.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.13% | 32.84% | -23.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.13% | 32.07% | -22.94% |
XBFR vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBFR vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
XBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while LOUP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 0.00% |
XBFR Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBFR and LOUP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBFR.
XBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for LOUP.
XBFR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBFR and 0.70% for LOUP.
Find the right allocation for XBFR and LOUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer