XBFR vs. KAPR

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

XBFR (Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF) and KAPR (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. XBFR is actively managed, while KAPR is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

XBFR vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XBFR

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -0.43%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KAPR

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.77%
• 6M: 13.15%
• YTD: 13.15%
• 1Y: 22.38%
• 3Y*: 13.01%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBFR vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XBFR Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF	6.21%
KAPR Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April	11.34%

Correlation

The correlation between XBFR and KAPR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026	0.75

Return for Risk

XBFR vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBFR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KAPR

KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 97
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBFR vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBFR	KAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.40	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.26	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.71	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	8.93	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	41.90	—

Drawdowns

XBFR vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBFR drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum KAPR drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBFR and KAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBFR	KAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-16.91%	+12.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.52%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-0.13%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.12%	-3.87%	+2.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XBFR	KAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.90%	6.62%	+2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.90%	11.76%	-2.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.90%	11.63%	-2.73%

XBFR vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XBFR and KAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

XBFR vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison

XBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while KAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
KAPR Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April	0.00%
XBFR Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBFR and KAPR in my portfolio?

XBFR and KAPR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XBFR or KAPR?

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBFR or KAPR?

XBFR and KAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBFR or KAPR?

XBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for KAPR.