XBCI vs. SOEZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ).

XBCI and SOEZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XBCI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Feb 2, 2026. SOEZ is an actively managed fund by Franklin. It was launched on Dec 3, 2025.

Performance

XBCI vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XBCI vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	-11.88%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	-16.14%

Returns By Period

XBCI

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -0.61%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOEZ

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -3.90%
• YTD: -31.67%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBCI vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

XBCI

NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF

SOEZ

Franklin Solana ETF

Return for Risk

XBCI vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XBCI	SOEZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.64	-1.03	+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between XBCI and SOEZ is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XBCI vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison

XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than SOEZ's 0.09% yield.

	TTM
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	7.25%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	0.09%

Drawdowns

XBCI vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, smaller than the maximum SOEZ drawdown of -47.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and SOEZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBCI	SOEZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.49%	-47.78%	+28.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.88%	-42.58%	+30.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.13%	-25.30%	+14.17%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XBCI	SOEZ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	86.31%	77.92%	+8.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	86.31%	77.92%	+8.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	86.31%	77.92%	+8.39%