XBCI vs. SOEZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOEZ.

Performance

XBCI vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XBCI

• 1D: -3.98%
• 1M: -23.50%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOEZ

• 1D: -4.56%
• 1M: -14.51%
• YTD: -40.75%
• 6M: -47.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBCI vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	-16.32%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	-27.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XBCI and SOEZ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026	0.87

Return for Risk

XBCI vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XBCI	SOEZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.63	-1.07	+0.44

Drawdowns

XBCI vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, smaller than the maximum SOEZ drawdown of -50.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and SOEZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBCI	SOEZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.99%	-50.21%	+24.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.99%	-50.21%	+24.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	-30.80%	+22.74%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XBCI	SOEZ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.08%	68.92%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.08%	68.92%	-1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.08%	68.92%	-1.84%

XBCI vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBCI vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison

XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, more than SOEZ's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	0.57%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	20.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBCI and SOEZ in my portfolio?

XBCI and SOEZ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XBCI or SOEZ?

On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBCI or SOEZ?

SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBCI or SOEZ?

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 20.51%, compared with 0.57% for SOEZ.

What is the main difference between XBCI and SOEZ?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.19% for SOEZ.