PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBCI vs. MLPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBCI vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XBCI

1D
-3.98%
1M
-23.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MLPI

1D
0.04%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
17.58%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBCI vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XBCI and MLPI is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBCI vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XBCI vs. MLPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBCIMLPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

3.49

-4.11

Drawdowns

XBCI vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and MLPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBCIMLPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.99%

-5.38%

-20.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.99%

-3.84%

-22.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-1.27%

-6.79%

Volatility

XBCI vs. MLPI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBCIMLPIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.08%

13.05%

+54.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.08%

13.05%

+54.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.08%

13.05%

+54.03%

XBCI vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBCI vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, more than MLPI's 6.04% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XBCI and MLPI have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MLPI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MLPI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 20.51%, compared with 6.04% for MLPI.

XBCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MLPI is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.68% for MLPI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBCI and MLPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer