XBCI vs. IBLC
Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC).
XBCI and IBLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XBCI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Feb 2, 2026. IBLC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2022.
Performance
XBCI vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XBCI vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | -12.38% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | -12.33% |
Returns By Period
XBCI
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- 6.56%
- 1M
- -5.99%
- YTD
- -10.68%
- 6M
- -29.99%
- 1Y
- 57.18%
- 3Y*
- 34.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XBCI vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XBCI vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
XBCI
IBLC
XBCI vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBCI | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 0.23 | -0.89 |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCI and IBLC is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XBCI vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, more than IBLC's 7.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | 7.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 7.06% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
XBCI vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and IBLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCI | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.49% | -62.54% | +43.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.38% | -41.28% | +28.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.11% | -26.00% | +14.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.15% | — |
Volatility
XBCI vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XBCI | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 44.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.41% | 58.34% | +29.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.41% | 65.16% | +22.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.41% | 65.16% | +22.25% |