XBCI vs. IBIT
XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. XBCI is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
XBCI vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBCI
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- 6M
- -32.10%
- YTD
- -29.06%
- 1Y
- -47.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBCI vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | -24.98% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -20.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCI and IBIT is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCI vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
XBCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBIT
XBCI vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBCI | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.82 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBCI vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCI | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.31% | -53.30% | +15.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.79% | -50.60% | +17.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.10% | -17.56% | +3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 32.72% | — |
Volatility
XBCI vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCI | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.47% | 44.38% | +21.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.47% | 49.97% | +15.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.47% | 49.97% | +15.50% |
XBCI vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBCI vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.75%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% |
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | 26.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, XBCI and IBIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.
XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 26.75%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.25% for IBIT.
Find the right allocation for XBCI and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer