XBCI vs. BTCZ
XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.99, they often move in opposite directions. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
XBCI vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBCI
- 1D
- -3.98%
- 1M
- -23.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- 46.26%
- YTD
- 32.54%
- 6M
- 46.67%
- 1Y
- 55.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBCI vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | -16.32% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 6.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCI and BTCZ is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | -0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCI vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
XBCI
BTCZ
XBCI vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBCI | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | -0.57 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
XBCI vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCI | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.99% | -91.06% | +65.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.99% | -78.63% | +52.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -73.72% | +65.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.74% | — |
Volatility
XBCI vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCI | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 68.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.08% | 87.46% | -20.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.08% | 97.12% | -30.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.08% | 97.12% | -30.04% |
XBCI vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBCI vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | 20.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBCI and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.
XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 20.51%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.95% for BTCZ.
Find the right allocation for XBCI and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer