XBCI vs. BLOX
XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BLOX.
Performance
XBCI vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBCI
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BLOX
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- 6M
- -10.66%
- YTD
- -5.17%
- 1Y
- -9.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.87M | $5.29M | $6.27M | |
| $3.48M | $3.42M | $5.46M |
XBCI vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | -22.94% |
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | -4.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCI and BLOX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCI vs. BLOX — Risk / Return Rank
XBCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLOX
XBCI vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBCI | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.00 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBCI vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, smaller than the maximum BLOX drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and BLOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCI | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.31% | -47.09% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.97% | -34.45% | +3.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -19.83% | +4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.55% | — |
Volatility
XBCI vs. BLOX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCI | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.61% | 57.17% | +5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.61% | 55.13% | +7.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.61% | 55.13% | +7.48% |
XBCI vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBCI vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison
XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.04%, less than BLOX's 50.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 49.69% | 22.69% |
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | 26.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBCI and BLOX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBCI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBCI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.
BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 49.69%, compared with 26.04% for XBCI.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 1.03% for BLOX.
Find the right allocation for XBCI and BLOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer