XBCI vs. BITS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and BITS (Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. XBCI is actively managed, while BITS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BITS.

Performance

XBCI vs. BITS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XBCI

• 1D: -3.98%
• 1M: -23.50%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITS

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: 4.17%
• 6M: -6.53%
• 1Y: 19.33%
• 3Y*: 49.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBCI vs. BITS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	-16.32%
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XBCI and BITS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026	0.85

Return for Risk

XBCI vs. BITS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS

BITS Risk / Return Rank: 15
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 16
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBCI vs. BITS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XBCI	BITS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.63	0.02	-0.64

Drawdowns

XBCI vs. BITS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, smaller than the maximum BITS drawdown of -83.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and BITS.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBCI	BITS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.99%	-83.11%	+57.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-48.38%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-48.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.99%	-31.42%	+5.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	-42.76%	+34.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	25.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XBCI	BITS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	40.38%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.08%	52.55%	+14.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.08%	60.91%	+6.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.08%	60.91%	+6.17%

XBCI vs. BITS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BITS's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBCI vs. BITS - Dividend Comparison

XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, less than BITS's 21.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	21.88%	22.80%	29.49%	13.69%	0.48%	1.90%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	20.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBCI and BITS in my portfolio?

XBCI and BITS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XBCI or BITS?

On fees, BITS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBCI or BITS?

BITS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBCI or BITS?

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 21.88%, compared with 20.51% for XBCI.

What is the main difference between XBCI and BITS?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.65% for BITS.