PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBCI vs. BITC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBCI vs. BITC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XBCI

1D
-3.98%
1M
-23.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITC

1D
-0.00%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
6.98%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
-15.09%
3Y*
36.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBCI vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XBCI and BITC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBCI vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBCI

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBCI vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XBCI vs. BITC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBCIBITCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

0.68

-1.30

Drawdowns

XBCI vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, smaller than the maximum BITC drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and BITC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBCIBITCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.99%

-38.51%

+12.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.99%

-26.48%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-16.37%

+8.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.37%

Volatility

XBCI vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBCIBITCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.08%

25.54%

+41.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.08%

46.65%

+20.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.08%

46.65%

+20.43%

XBCI vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBCI vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison

XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, more than BITC's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.14%3.36%42.68%5.82%
XBCI
NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF
20.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBCI and BITC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BITC is cheaper at 0.88% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BITC is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 20.51%, compared with 3.14% for BITC.

They also come from different issuers: Neos and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.88% for BITC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBCI and BITC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer