PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBCI vs. BFOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBCI vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XBCI

1D
-3.98%
1M
-23.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFOC

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-7.39%
6M
-9.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBCI vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XBCI and BFOC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.86

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBCI vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XBCI vs. BFOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBCIBFOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

-1.88

+1.25

Drawdowns

XBCI vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and BFOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBCIBFOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.99%

-18.20%

-7.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.99%

-18.20%

-7.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-12.52%

+4.46%

Volatility

XBCI vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBCIBFOCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.08%

12.61%

+54.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.08%

12.61%

+54.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.08%

12.61%

+54.47%

XBCI vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBCI vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


XBCI and BFOC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 20.51%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.

XBCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Neos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.90% for BFOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBCI and BFOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer