PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFOC vs. ESK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFOC vs. ESK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BFOC

1D
-1.01%
1M
-0.60%
6M
-6.08%
YTD
-7.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

ESK

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.88K$50.79K$63.29K

BFOC vs. ESK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFOC and ESK is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFOC vs. ESK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFOC vs. ESK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFOC vs. ESK - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFOCESKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.50%

Volatility

BFOC vs. ESK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFOCESKDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.68%

BFOC vs. ESK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ESK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFOC vs. ESK - Dividend Comparison

BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BFOC and ESK have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

ESK has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.

BFOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ESK is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.75% for ESK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFOC and ESK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer