XBAP vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XBAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBAP is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. XBAP is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XBAP returned 9.51%/yr vs 20.07%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

XBAP vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBAP achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return.

XBAP

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 6M: 7.77%
• 1Y: 14.57%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -4.52%
• YTD: 24.93%
• 6M: 25.03%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 28.90%
• 5Y*: 20.07%
• 10Y*: 11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBAP vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XBAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April	7.58%	13.38%	11.55%	20.53%	-7.59%	7.65%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	24.93%	5.88%	42.17%	15.63%	17.48%	16.28%

Correlation

The correlation between XBAP and ENFR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	0.40

The correlation between XBAP and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XBAP vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XBAP	ENFR
Technology	39.1%	-
Financial Services	10.9%	0.1%
Communication Services	10.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	-
Healthcare	8.3%	-
Industrials	7.8%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.1%	98.5%
Utilities	2.1%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

XBAP vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBAP

XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 57
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBAP vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBAP	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.06	1.88	+2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.30	2.59	+4.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.04	1.32	+0.71
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.29	3.23	+8.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	64.34	8.24	+56.09

XBAP vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBAP Sharpe Ratio is 4.06, which is higher than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBAP and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XBAP vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBAP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAP and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBAP	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.57%	-68.28%	+53.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.30%	-8.64%	+7.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.25%	-15.58%	+7.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.57%	-20.29%	+5.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-4.71%	+4.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	-15.94%	+14.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.23%	3.38%	-3.15%

Volatility

XBAP vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) is 1.57%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that XBAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XBAP	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.57%	5.69%	-4.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.94%	11.60%	-8.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.62%	14.86%	-11.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.98%	19.25%	-9.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.84%	24.68%	-14.84%

XBAP vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBAP vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

XBAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.02%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
XBAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBAP and ENFR in my portfolio?

XBAP and ENFR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XBAP or ENFR?

ENFR has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to XBAP (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBAP dropped -14.57% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, XBAP or ENFR?

On 5-year performance, ENFR leads with 20.07% vs 9.51% for XBAP. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XBAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XBAP or ENFR?

Over the 5-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 20.07% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBAP or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBAP or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.00% for XBAP.

What is the main difference between XBAP and ENFR?

XBAP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBAP and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.06 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.