XB4A.DE vs. PR1Z.DE
XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) and PR1Z.DE (Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Europe Equities funds - XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index while PR1Z.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Eurozone Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XB4A.DE returned 17.80%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for PR1Z.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XB4A.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PR1Z.DE.
Performance
XB4A.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XB4A.DE achieves a 22.80% return, which is significantly higher than PR1Z.DE's 10.76% return.
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 1Y
- 45.21%
- 3Y*
- 30.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
PR1Z.DE
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- 6M
- 6.62%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 20.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- —
XB4A.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 22.80% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 11.02% |
PR1Z.DE Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) | 10.76% | 24.78% | 9.45% | 19.41% | -12.44% | 27.38% | -4.63% | 22.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XB4A.DE and PR1Z.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2019 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XB4A.DE and PR1Z.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XB4A.DE vs. PR1Z.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XB4A.DE
PR1Z.DE
XB4A.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) and Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XB4A.DE | PR1Z.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.26 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 1.98 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 7.42 | +6.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XB4A.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XB4A.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, which is greater than PR1Z.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB4A.DE and PR1Z.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XB4A.DE | PR1Z.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.54% | -39.55% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -10.31% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -15.67% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.50% | -24.21% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.43% | -3.14% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -5.54% | -4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 2.76% | +0.47% |
Volatility
XB4A.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE) at 4.10%. This indicates that XB4A.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1Z.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XB4A.DE | PR1Z.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 4.10% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.95% | 12.54% | +2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 14.77% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 16.31% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 18.65% | +1.50% |
XB4A.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XB4A.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1Z.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XB4A.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Dividend Comparison
XB4A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1Z.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR1Z.DE Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) | 2.28% | 2.53% | 2.77% | 2.80% | 3.09% | 1.83% | 2.11% | 2.60% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XB4A.DE and PR1Z.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PR1Z.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1Z.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index, while PR1Z.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Eurozone Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XB4A.DE and 0.05% for PR1Z.DE.
Find the right allocation for XB4A.DE and PR1Z.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer