PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XB vs. ZTOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XB vs. ZTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) and F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XB achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than ZTOP's 1.53% return.


XB

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.29%
1Y
7.35%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
10Y*

ZTOP

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.53%
6M
2.09%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XB vs. ZTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XB and ZTOP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025

0.87

The correlation between XB and ZTOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XB vs. ZTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XB
XB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTOP
ZTOP Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ZTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XB vs. ZTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) and F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBZTOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.40

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.61

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

11.86

+3.15

XB vs. ZTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XB Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the ZTOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XB and ZTOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBZTOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.00

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

2.48

-1.64

Drawdowns

XB vs. ZTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XB drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, which is greater than ZTOP's maximum drawdown of -2.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB and ZTOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBZTOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-2.52%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.16%

-2.52%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.27%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-0.29%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

0.55%

-0.06%

Volatility

XB vs. ZTOP - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) at 1.04%. This indicates that XB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBZTOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.04%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

2.59%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74%

3.29%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.44%

3.49%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.44%

3.49%

+3.95%

XB vs. ZTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTOP's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XB vs. ZTOP - Dividend Comparison

XB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, more than ZTOP's 6.24% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
XB
BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.08%6.96%7.74%7.87%5.01%
ZTOP
F/m High Yield 100 ETF
6.24%4.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XB and ZTOP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XB has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to ZTOP (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XB dropped -9.25% vs ZTOP's -2.52%.

On 1-year performance, XB leads with 7.35% vs 6.55% for ZTOP. On fees, XB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ZTOP has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XB has performed better with a 7.35% return vs 6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZTOP.

XB has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 6.24% for ZTOP.

XB tracks ICE BofA Single-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while ZTOP tracks Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Top 100 Quality Select Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XB and 0.39% for ZTOP.

ZTOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XB and ZTOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer