PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XAXJ.L vs. CPJ1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XAXJ.L vs. CPJ1.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XAXJ.L (Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and CPJ1.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - XAXJ.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD while CPJ1.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XAXJ.L returned 7.37%/yr vs 8.53%/yr for CPJ1.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAXJ.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CPJ1.L.

Performance

XAXJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XAXJ.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAXJ.L achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than CPJ1.L's 8.83% return. Over the past 10 years, XAXJ.L has underperformed CPJ1.L with an annualized return of 7.37%, while CPJ1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.53% annualized return.

XAXJ.L

1D
-1.69%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
1.72%
6M
0.31%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
9.12%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*
7.37%

CPJ1.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.44%
YTD
8.83%
6M
9.62%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
8.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAXJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAXJ.L
Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C		1.72%20.48%10.76%-8.18%-10.59%-4.15%20.15%12.59%-9.32%28.24%
CPJ1.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc		8.83%12.05%6.89%0.15%4.86%5.71%3.46%14.30%-5.53%15.18%

Correlation

The correlation between XAXJ.L and CPJ1.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2011

0.69

The correlation between XAXJ.L and CPJ1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.74 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XAXJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XAXJ.L
CPJ1.L

Technology

27.5%
1.1%

Industrials

23.4%
8.6%

Financial Services

15.9%
45.5%

Healthcare

9.5%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
6.1%

Communication Services

7.8%
2.9%

Real Estate

5.7%
7.9%

Basic Materials

2.2%
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
2.9%

Energy

0.3%
2.8%

Utilities

0.3%
3.6%

Technology

XAXJ.L
27.5%
CPJ1.L
1.1%

Industrials

XAXJ.L
23.4%
CPJ1.L
8.6%

Financial Services

XAXJ.L
15.9%
CPJ1.L
45.5%

Healthcare

XAXJ.L
9.5%
CPJ1.L
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XAXJ.L
8.2%
CPJ1.L
6.1%

Communication Services

XAXJ.L
7.8%
CPJ1.L
2.9%

Real Estate

XAXJ.L
5.7%
CPJ1.L
7.9%

Basic Materials

XAXJ.L
2.2%
CPJ1.L
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

XAXJ.L
1.5%
CPJ1.L
2.9%

Energy

XAXJ.L
0.3%
CPJ1.L
2.8%

Utilities

XAXJ.L
0.3%
CPJ1.L
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C

iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc

Often compared with XAXJ.L:
XAXJ.L vs. ESPS.LXAXJ.L vs. KRWL.LXAXJ.L vs. FLRK.LXAXJ.L vs. IAPD.LXAXJ.L vs. CSKR.LXAXJ.L vs. GSLC.LXAXJ.L vs. PAXJ.L
Often compared with CPJ1.L:
CPJ1.L vs. AGES.LCPJ1.L vs. CUKX.LCPJ1.L vs. LGAG.LCPJ1.L vs. ETLK.DECPJ1.L vs. IUKD.LCPJ1.L vs. VUKE.LCPJ1.L vs. PADV.L

Return for Risk

XAXJ.L vs. CPJ1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XAXJ.L
XAXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XAXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L
CPJ1.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAXJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XAXJ.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XAXJ.LCPJ1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.02
1.59

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.50
2.37

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.29

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.41

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.85

7.27

-3.42

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XAXJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAXJ.L and CPJ1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XAXJ.LCPJ1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.59

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.44

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.54

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.45

+0.01

Drawdowns

XAXJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, which is greater than CPJ1.L's maximum drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAXJ.L and CPJ1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XAXJ.LCPJ1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.15%

-32.49%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-7.23%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.46%

-17.15%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-17.61%

-12.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.15%

-32.49%

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.49%

-2.97%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.14%

-6.90%

-4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

2.40%

+1.68%

Volatility

XAXJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XAXJ.L) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) at 3.70%. This indicates that XAXJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPJ1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XAXJ.LCPJ1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

3.70%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

8.65%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

10.99%

+4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

13.74%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

15.93%

+2.30%

XAXJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAXJ.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CPJ1.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAXJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XAXJ.L nor CPJ1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

XAXJ.L and CPJ1.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CPJ1.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CPJ1.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XAXJ.L.

XAXJ.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while CPJ1.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XAXJ.L and 0.20% for CPJ1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAXJ.L and CPJ1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer