XAR vs. XDEF
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - XAR tracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index while XDEF tracks the STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XAR vs. XDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XAR
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 20.10%
- 1Y
- 41.33%
- 3Y*
- 34.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.01%
XDEF
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAR vs. XDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 9.26% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | -99.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and XDEF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. XDEF — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
XDEF
XAR vs. XDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAR | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAR | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | -0.64 | +1.48 |
Drawdowns
XAR vs. XDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum XDEF drawdown of -99.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and XDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -99.30% | +52.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -99.26% | +92.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -70.45% | +63.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | — | — |
Volatility
XAR vs. XDEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.81% | 157.63% | -130.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 157.63% | -134.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 157.63% | -133.01% |
XAR vs. XDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XAR and XDEF have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XAR vs. XDEF - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while XDEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and XDEF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAR and XDEF have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for XDEF.
XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while XDEF tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for XAR and XDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer