XAR vs. XDEF
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - XAR tracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index while XDEF tracks the STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XAR vs. XDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XAR
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -7.89%
- 6M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 24.03%
- 3Y*
- 29.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.36%
XDEF
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- -99.17%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $64.82M | $59.56M | $61.10M | |
| $25.38K | $19.51K | $30.56K |
XAR vs. XDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 9.86% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | -99.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and XDEF is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. XDEF — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
XDEF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XAR vs. XDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAR | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.45 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAR vs. XDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum XDEF drawdown of -99.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and XDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -99.30% | +52.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.47% | -99.21% | +89.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -77.91% | +71.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.61% | — | — |
Volatility
XAR vs. XDEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.75% | 134.34% | -105.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 134.34% | -110.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 134.34% | -109.49% |
XAR vs. XDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XAR and XDEF have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XAR vs. XDEF - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than XDEF's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and XDEF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAR and XDEF have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while XDEF tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for XAR and XDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer