XAR vs. VTI
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XAR returned 18.55%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for VTI. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
XAR vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 17.94% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has outperformed VTI with an annualized return of 18.55%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively lower 14.93% annualized return.
XAR
- 1D
- 6.62%
- 1M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 17.94%
- 6M
- 18.96%
- 1Y
- 43.77%
- 3Y*
- 34.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 18.55%
VTI
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 24.47%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- 14.93%
XAR vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 17.94% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.00% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and VTI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.70 |
The correlation between XAR and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
XAR vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XAR
VTI
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XAR
VTI
Technology
XAR
VTI
Basic Materials
XAR
-
VTI
Communication Services
XAR
-
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
XAR
-
VTI
Consumer Defensive
XAR
-
VTI
Energy
XAR
-
VTI
Financial Services
XAR
-
VTI
Healthcare
XAR
-
VTI
Real Estate
XAR
-
VTI
Utilities
XAR
-
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
VTI
XAR vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAR | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 2.76 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.17 | 12.38 | -5.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAR vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -55.45% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -8.92% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -19.30% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -25.36% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | -35.00% | -11.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -2.69% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -8.02% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.12% | 1.98% | +4.14% |
Volatility
XAR vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.49%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.32% | 4.49% | +6.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.52% | 9.83% | +13.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.80% | 12.63% | +15.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 17.47% | +6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 18.33% | +6.41% |
XAR vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than VTI's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and VTI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to VTI (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 18.55% vs 14.93% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 18.55% return vs 14.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer