PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAR vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 50.09% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 17.38%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 34.16% annualized return.


XAR

1D
0.77%
1M
-7.89%
6M
-2.90%
YTD
9.86%
1Y
24.03%
3Y*
29.11%
5Y*
16.36%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
18.36%

SMH

1D
0.30%
1M
-8.74%
6M
33.97%
YTD
50.09%
1Y
90.95%
3Y*
50.56%
5Y*
33.46%
10Y*
34.16%
ALL TIME*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.28B$7.64B$7.07B
$64.82M$59.56M$61.10M

XAR vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
9.86%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-4.58%33.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
50.09%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and SMH is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011

0.51

The correlation between XAR and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

XAR vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XAR
SMH

Industrials

95.8%

-

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Technology

1.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

XAR
95.8%
SMH

-

Basic Materials

XAR
3.1%
SMH

-

Technology

XAR
1.0%
SMH
100.0%

Communication Services

XAR

-

SMH

-

Consumer Cyclical

XAR

-

SMH

-

Consumer Defensive

XAR

-

SMH

-

Energy

XAR

-

SMH

-

Financial Services

XAR

-

SMH

-

Healthcare

XAR

-

SMH

-

Real Estate

XAR

-

SMH

-

Utilities

XAR

-

SMH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAR vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XAR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XARSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.36

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

3.58

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.45

14.64

-11.20

XAR vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XARSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-84.96%

+38.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-24.62%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

-35.74%

+16.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.55%

-45.30%

+17.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

-45.30%

-1.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.47%

-19.19%

+9.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-40.89%

+34.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.61%

6.01%

+0.60%

Volatility

XAR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) is 8.97%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.70%. This indicates that XAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XARSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.97%

14.70%

-5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.17%

33.13%

-9.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.75%

38.57%

-9.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.84%

36.50%

-12.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.85%

33.32%

-8.47%

XAR vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XAR and SMH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

XAR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than SMH's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.20%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.31%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAR and SMH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to XAR (8.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs SMH's -84.96%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 34.16% vs 17.38% for XAR. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, XAR has been the lower-risk option at 8.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 34.16% return vs 17.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XAR and SMH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.20% for SMH.

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while SMH is Semiconductors. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAR and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer