XAR vs. DRNZ
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - XAR tracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index while DRNZ tracks the VettaFi Drone Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRNZ.
Performance
XAR vs. DRNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly lower than DRNZ's 24.77% return.
XAR
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 20.10%
- 1Y
- 41.33%
- 3Y*
- 34.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.01%
DRNZ
- 1D
- -6.81%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 24.77%
- 6M
- 32.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAR vs. DRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 13.40% | -3.77% |
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 24.77% | -10.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and DRNZ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. DRNZ — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
DRNZ
XAR vs. DRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAR | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAR | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.39 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
XAR vs. DRNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, which is greater than DRNZ's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and DRNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -24.52% | -21.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -7.44% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -11.12% | +4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | — | — |
Volatility
XAR vs. DRNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.81% | 50.82% | -24.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 50.82% | -27.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 50.82% | -26.20% |
XAR vs. DRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DRNZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. DRNZ - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while DRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and DRNZ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRNZ.
XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for DRNZ.
XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while DRNZ tracks VettaFi Drone Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.65% for DRNZ.
Find the right allocation for XAR and DRNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer