PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAR vs. DFEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAR vs. DFEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly lower than DFEM's 14.75% return.


XAR

1D
0.77%
1M
-7.89%
6M
-2.90%
YTD
9.86%
1Y
24.03%
3Y*
29.11%
5Y*
16.36%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
18.36%

DFEM

1D
0.43%
1M
-4.27%
6M
6.72%
YTD
14.75%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$43.02M$39.58M$39.86M
$64.82M$59.56M$61.10M

XAR vs. DFEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
9.86%46.15%23.32%23.79%-4.13%
DFEM
Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF
14.75%29.51%7.53%13.91%-9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and DFEM is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022

0.49

The correlation between XAR and DFEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

XAR vs. DFEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XAR
DFEM

Industrials

95.8%
10.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%
7.3%

Technology

1.0%
40.4%

Communication Services

-

5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.3%

Energy

-

3.4%

Financial Services

-

14.8%

Healthcare

-

3.6%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Industrials

XAR
95.8%
DFEM
10.6%

Basic Materials

XAR
3.1%
DFEM
7.3%

Technology

XAR
1.0%
DFEM
40.4%

Communication Services

XAR

-

DFEM
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XAR

-

DFEM
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

XAR

-

DFEM
3.3%

Energy

XAR

-

DFEM
3.4%

Financial Services

XAR

-

DFEM
14.8%

Healthcare

XAR

-

DFEM
3.6%

Real Estate

XAR

-

DFEM
1.7%

Utilities

XAR

-

DFEM
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAR vs. DFEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEM
DFEM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XAR vs. DFEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XARDFEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

2.08

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.45

6.85

-3.40

XAR vs. DFEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the DFEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and DFEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAR vs. DFEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, which is greater than DFEM's maximum drawdown of -20.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and DFEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XARDFEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-20.82%

-25.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-13.84%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

-18.09%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.47%

-10.46%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-5.08%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.61%

4.19%

+2.42%

Volatility

XAR vs. DFEM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) at 8.15%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XARDFEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.97%

8.15%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.17%

20.62%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.75%

22.46%

+6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.84%

18.17%

+5.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.85%

18.17%

+6.68%

XAR vs. DFEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAR vs. DFEM - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than DFEM's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFEM
Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF
1.97%2.32%2.50%2.38%1.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.31%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAR and DFEM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XAR has higher volatility (8.97%) compared to DFEM (8.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs DFEM's -20.82%.

On 3-year performance, XAR leads with 29.11% vs 17.44% for DFEM. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DFEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XAR has performed better with a 29.11% return vs 17.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DFEM.

DFEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while DFEM is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.39% for DFEM.

DFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAR and DFEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer