PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAPR vs. KLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XAPR vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XAPR vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAPR achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -8.98% return.


XAPR

1D
0.22%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.10%
6M
2.86%
1Y
12.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KLIP

1D
2.10%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
-8.98%
6M
-12.63%
1Y
-1.25%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XAPR vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XAPR vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

KLIP
KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAPR vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAPRKLIPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

-0.06

+1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

0.05

+2.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.01

+0.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

-0.08

+2.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.98

-0.26

+19.24

XAPR vs. KLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAPR and KLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAPRKLIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

-0.06

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

0.35

+1.44

Correlation

The correlation between XAPR and KLIP is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XAPR vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.24%.


Drawdowns

XAPR vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAPR drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAPR and KLIP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XAPRKLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-18.61%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-17.23%

+11.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.21%

+14.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-3.34%

+3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

5.18%

-4.53%

Volatility

XAPR vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) is 0.45%, while KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that XAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XAPRKLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

7.16%

-6.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.19%

13.48%

-12.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.15%

19.76%

-11.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.41%

18.19%

-11.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.41%

18.19%

-11.78%