XAGH.TO vs. XIU.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XAGH.TO (iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAGH.TO is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index (CAD-Hedged), while XIU.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XAGH.TO returned 2.41%/yr vs 23.20%/yr for XIU.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

XAGH.TO vs. XIU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAGH.TO achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than XIU.TO's 11.56% return.

XAGH.TO

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -0.48%
• 6M: -0.56%
• 1Y: 2.64%
• 3Y*: 2.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XIU.TO

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: 5.10%
• YTD: 11.56%
• 6M: 12.35%
• 1Y: 33.92%
• 3Y*: 23.20%
• 5Y*: 14.66%
• 10Y*: 12.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAGH.TO vs. XIU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XAGH.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	-0.48%	5.24%	0.01%	4.10%	-13.03%	0.15%
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF	11.56%	28.89%	20.73%	11.85%	-6.35%	1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XAGH.TO and XIU.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021	0.12

The correlation between XAGH.TO and XIU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XAGH.TO vs. XIU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAGH.TO

XAGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 19
XAGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
XAGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
XAGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 18
XAGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XAGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 21

XIU.TO

XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 87
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAGH.TO vs. XIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XAGH.TO	XIU.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	2.89	-2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	3.86	-2.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.52	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	4.45	-3.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.37	20.69	-18.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XAGH.TO vs. XIU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAGH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAGH.TO and XIU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XAGH.TO	XIU.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	2.89	-2.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.21	0.51	-0.72

Drawdowns

XAGH.TO vs. XIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAGH.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, smaller than the maximum XIU.TO drawdown of -52.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGH.TO and XIU.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAGH.TO	XIU.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.09%	-52.31%	+35.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.18%	-7.65%	+4.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.03%	-12.36%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.54%	0.00%	-5.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.71%	-11.62%	+2.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	1.64%	-0.52%

Volatility

XAGH.TO vs. XIU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) is 1.69%, while iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that XAGH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAGH.TO	XIU.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.69%	3.43%	-1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.00%	9.39%	-6.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.42%	11.79%	-7.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.95%	12.79%	-4.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.95%	15.01%	-7.06%

XAGH.TO vs. XIU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XAGH.TO and XIU.TO have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XAGH.TO vs. XIU.TO - Dividend Comparison

XAGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than XIU.TO's 2.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XAGH.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	4.00%	3.78%	3.51%	3.05%	1.91%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF	2.17%	2.39%	2.92%	3.16%	3.02%	2.43%	3.03%	2.87%	3.18%	2.58%	2.65%	3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAGH.TO and XIU.TO in my portfolio?

XAGH.TO and XIU.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XAGH.TO or XIU.TO?

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAGH.TO or XIU.TO?

XAGH.TO and XIU.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

What is the main difference between XAGH.TO and XIU.TO?

XAGH.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while XIU.TO is Canada Equities. XAGH.TO tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index (CAD-Hedged), while XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index.