PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAGG vs. MANI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAGG vs. MANI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and Man Active Income ETF (MANI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAGG achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than MANI's 4.63% return.


XAGG

1D
0.05%
1M
0.45%
6M
1.69%
YTD
2.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MANI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.77%
6M
4.28%
YTD
4.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAGG vs. MANI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XAGG
Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF
2.53%1.75%
MANI
Man Active Income ETF
4.63%1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between XAGG and MANI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAGG vs. MANI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and Man Active Income ETF (MANI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XAGG vs. MANI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAGG vs. MANI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAGG drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, which is greater than MANI's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG and MANI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAGGMANIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-0.74%

-2.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.04%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-0.10%

-0.43%

Volatility

XAGG vs. MANI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAGGMANIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

2.01%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.45%

2.01%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.45%

2.01%

+1.44%

XAGG vs. MANI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAGG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MANI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAGG vs. MANI - Dividend Comparison

XAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than MANI's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM2025
MANI
Man Active Income ETF
4.67%3.00%
XAGG
Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF
4.45%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAGG and MANI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAGG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAGG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MANI.

MANI has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 4.45% for XAGG.

They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAGG and 0.85% for MANI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAGG and MANI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer