XAGG.TO vs. 0GGH.L
XAGG.TO (iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF) and 0GGH.L (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XAGG.TO is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while 0GGH.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XAGG.TO returned 5.35%/yr vs 4.83%/yr for 0GGH.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
XAGG.TO vs. 0GGH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XAGG.TO is traded in CAD, while 0GGH.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 0GGH.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAGG.TO achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than 0GGH.L's -0.73% return.
XAGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 6.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
0GGH.L
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 1Y
- 2.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.02%
- 10Y*
- —
XAGG.TO vs. 0GGH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAGG.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 2.48% | 1.66% | 10.15% | 1.14% | -6.66% | 1.36% |
0GGH.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | -0.73% | 10.23% | 3.95% | 5.09% | -13.17% | -3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAGG.TO and 0GGH.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2021 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAGG.TO vs. 0GGH.L — Risk / Return Rank
XAGG.TO
0GGH.L
XAGG.TO vs. 0GGH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAGG.TO | 0GGH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.05 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 0.32 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.58 | 0.86 | +2.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAGG.TO vs. 0GGH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.65%, smaller than the maximum 0GGH.L drawdown of -30.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG.TO and 0GGH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAGG.TO | 0GGH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.65% | -30.15% | +17.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.32% | -6.31% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.64% | -6.46% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -7.33% | +5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -11.45% | +6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.36% | -0.44% |
Volatility
XAGG.TO vs. 0GGH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) is 1.46%, while iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that XAGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0GGH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAGG.TO | 0GGH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 1.72% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.17% | 6.35% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.47% | 8.67% | -3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 25.43% | -18.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 22.51% | -15.48% |
XAGG.TO vs. 0GGH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XAGG.TO and 0GGH.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XAGG.TO vs. 0GGH.L - Dividend Comparison
XAGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, while 0GGH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0GGH.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAGG.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 4.10% | 3.87% | 3.07% | 2.59% | 1.67% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAGG.TO and 0GGH.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAGG.TO and 0GGH.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
XAGG.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while 0GGH.L is Global Bonds. XAGG.TO tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while 0GGH.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index.
Find the right allocation for XAGG.TO and 0GGH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer