PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0GGH.L vs. IRCP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

0GGH.L vs. IRCP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) and iShares € Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IRCP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0GGH.L achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than IRCP.L's 1.46% return.


0GGH.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.69%
6M
-0.69%
YTD
-0.48%
1Y
1.16%
3Y*
2.17%
5Y*
-1.55%
10Y*

IRCP.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.05%
6M
1.47%
YTD
1.46%
1Y
3.00%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0GGH.L vs. IRCP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0GGH.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.48%2.71%1.27%4.35%-13.33%-2.45%3.79%4.91%-1.24%-0.35%
IRCP.L
iShares € Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
1.46%4.21%6.47%5.14%-2.74%-0.24%0.84%4.00%-3.63%0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between 0GGH.L and IRCP.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2017

-0.01

The correlation between 0GGH.L and IRCP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0GGH.L vs. IRCP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0GGH.L
0GGH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
0GGH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IRCP.L
IRCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IRCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IRCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0GGH.L vs. IRCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) and iShares € Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IRCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0GGH.LIRCP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.24

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

3.04

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.86

12.47

-11.61

0GGH.L vs. IRCP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0GGH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the IRCP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0GGH.L and IRCP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0GGH.L vs. IRCP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0GGH.L drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, which is greater than IRCP.L's maximum drawdown of -14.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0GGH.L and IRCP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0GGH.LIRCP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.17%

-14.44%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-1.03%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.90%

-1.96%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

-7.09%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.70%

-0.16%

-12.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-1.31%

-7.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.25%

+0.85%

Volatility

0GGH.L vs. IRCP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to iShares € Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IRCP.L) at 0.63%. This indicates that 0GGH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRCP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0GGH.LIRCP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.63%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

2.45%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

2.67%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.29%

2.97%

+21.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

3.79%

+17.12%

0GGH.L vs. IRCP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

0GGH.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IRCP.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

0GGH.L vs. IRCP.L - Dividend Comparison

0GGH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IRCP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0GGH.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IRCP.L
iShares € Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.58%2.91%3.70%2.52%0.43%0.70%0.82%0.92%0.58%0.71%1.35%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


0GGH.L and IRCP.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 0GGH.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

0GGH.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IRCP.L.

0GGH.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index, while IRCP.L tracks iShares € Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Dist). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for 0GGH.L and 0.25% for IRCP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0GGH.L and IRCP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer