0GGH.L vs. AGHG.L
0GGH.L (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and AGHG.L (Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)) are both Global Bonds funds - 0GGH.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index while AGHG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 0GGH.L returned -1.55%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for AGHG.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 0GGH.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for AGHG.L.
Performance
0GGH.L vs. AGHG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
0GGH.L is traded in EUR, while AGHG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AGHG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0GGH.L achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than AGHG.L's 3.53% return.
0GGH.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 1.16%
- 3Y*
- 2.17%
- 5Y*
- -1.55%
- 10Y*
- —
AGHG.L
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 3.53%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
0GGH.L vs. AGHG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0GGH.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | -0.48% | 2.71% | 1.27% | 4.35% | -13.33% | -1.09% |
AGHG.L Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) | 3.53% | -1.12% | 7.96% | 7.64% | -16.47% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0GGH.L and AGHG.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021 | 0.51 |
The correlation between 0GGH.L and AGHG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0GGH.L vs. AGHG.L — Risk / Return Rank
0GGH.L
AGHG.L
0GGH.L vs. AGHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) and Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 0GGH.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.20 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 2.47 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.86 | 6.20 | -5.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
0GGH.L vs. AGHG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0GGH.L drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, which is greater than AGHG.L's maximum drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0GGH.L and AGHG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0GGH.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.17% | -18.97% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -2.23% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.90% | -6.23% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.17% | -18.97% | -2.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.70% | -1.57% | -11.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.72% | -7.98% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 0.89% | +0.21% |
Volatility
0GGH.L vs. AGHG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) is 0.99%, while Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that 0GGH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGHG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0GGH.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 1.20% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 3.26% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33% | 4.73% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.29% | 7.16% | +17.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 7.15% | +13.76% |
0GGH.L vs. AGHG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
0GGH.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AGHG.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
0GGH.L vs. AGHG.L - Dividend Comparison
0GGH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0GGH.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AGHG.L Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) | 2.97% | 2.98% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 2.18% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
0GGH.L and AGHG.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGHG.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGHG.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for 0GGH.L.
0GGH.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index, while AGHG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for 0GGH.L and 0.08% for AGHG.L.
Find the right allocation for 0GGH.L and AGHG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer