WXET vs. AGQ
WXET (Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF) and AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - WXET is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while AGQ is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). WXET is actively managed, while AGQ is passively managed. Over the past year, WXET returned -7.52% vs 142.76% for AGQ. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WXET charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AGQ.
Performance
WXET vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WXET achieves a 27.79% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -30.83% return.
WXET
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -11.55%
- YTD
- 27.79%
- 6M
- 12.24%
- 1Y
- -7.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGQ
- 1D
- -5.25%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -30.83%
- 6M
- -5.75%
- 1Y
- 142.76%
- 3Y*
- 54.17%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
WXET vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF | 27.79% | -37.99% | -0.40% |
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -30.83% | 360.71% | -10.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between WXET and AGQ is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WXET vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank
WXET
AGQ
WXET vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WXET | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | 1.19 | -1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.14 | 1.91 | -1.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.32 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 1.88 | -2.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 3.59 | -3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WXET | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 1.19 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.31 | 0.08 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
WXET vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WXET drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXET and AGQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WXET | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.31% | -98.16% | +49.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | -76.21% | +40.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -76.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -76.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.94% | -85.31% | +51.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.48% | -79.86% | +49.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.34% | 39.92% | -16.58% |
Volatility
WXET vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) is 21.55%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 33.51%. This indicates that WXET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WXET | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.55% | 33.51% | -11.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.33% | 133.70% | -94.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.90% | 120.79% | -70.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.44% | 74.68% | -26.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.44% | 65.66% | -17.22% |
WXET vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
WXET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
WXET vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
WXET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF | 1.97% | 3.57% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WXET and AGQ have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGQ has higher volatility (33.51%) compared to WXET (21.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WXET dropped -48.31% vs AGQ's -98.16%.
On 1-year performance, AGQ leads with 142.76% vs -7.52% for WXET. On fees, AGQ is cheaper at 0.93% per year. On volatility, WXET has been the lower-risk option at 21.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AGQ has performed better with a 142.76% return vs -7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGQ is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WXET.
WXET has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for AGQ.
WXET is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while AGQ is Silver. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WXET and 0.93% for AGQ.
AGQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WXET and AGQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer