PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WXET vs. AGQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WXET vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WXET achieves a 27.79% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -30.83% return.


WXET

1D
-1.97%
1M
-11.55%
YTD
27.79%
6M
12.24%
1Y
-7.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AGQ

1D
-5.25%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-30.83%
6M
-5.75%
1Y
142.76%
3Y*
54.17%
5Y*
15.27%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WXET vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WXET
Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF
27.79%-37.99%-0.40%
AGQ
ProShares Ultra Silver
-30.83%360.71%-10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between WXET and AGQ is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WXET vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXET
WXET Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
WXET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXET Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXET Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WXET Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXET Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

AGQ
AGQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXET vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WXETAGQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.15

1.19

-1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.14

1.91

-1.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.32

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

1.88

-2.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.24

3.59

-3.83

WXET vs. AGQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXET Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the AGQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXET and AGQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WXETAGQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

1.19

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

0.08

-0.39

Drawdowns

WXET vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXET drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXET and AGQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WXETAGQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.31%

-98.16%

+49.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.64%

-76.21%

+40.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.94%

-85.31%

+51.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.48%

-79.86%

+49.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.34%

39.92%

-16.58%

Volatility

WXET vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) is 21.55%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 33.51%. This indicates that WXET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WXETAGQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.55%

33.51%

-11.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.33%

133.70%

-94.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.90%

120.79%

-70.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.44%

74.68%

-26.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.44%

65.66%

-17.22%

WXET vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

WXET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

WXET vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison

WXET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AGQ
ProShares Ultra Silver
0.00%0.00%0.00%
WXET
Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF
1.97%3.57%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


WXET and AGQ have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGQ has higher volatility (33.51%) compared to WXET (21.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WXET dropped -48.31% vs AGQ's -98.16%.

On 1-year performance, AGQ leads with 142.76% vs -7.52% for WXET. On fees, AGQ is cheaper at 0.93% per year. On volatility, WXET has been the lower-risk option at 21.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AGQ has performed better with a 142.76% return vs -7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGQ is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WXET.

WXET has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for AGQ.

WXET is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while AGQ is Silver. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WXET and 0.93% for AGQ.

AGQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WXET and AGQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer