PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WWSIX vs. LSSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WWSIX vs. LSSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional (WWSIX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWSIX achieves a 29.05% return, which is significantly higher than LSSCX's 20.58% return. Over the past 10 years, WWSIX has outperformed LSSCX with an annualized return of 14.47%, while LSSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.


WWSIX

1D
0.43%
1M
-2.47%
6M
17.00%
YTD
29.05%
1Y
58.83%
3Y*
21.22%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
14.47%
ALL TIME*
11.16%

LSSCX

1D
0.25%
1M
0.37%
6M
12.30%
YTD
20.58%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
9.96%
ALL TIME*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WWSIX vs. LSSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WWSIX
Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional
29.05%17.55%15.79%12.87%-12.30%30.04%11.27%28.74%-13.49%16.07%
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
20.58%5.31%10.89%19.39%-11.52%29.03%2.29%25.06%-16.81%10.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WWSIX and LSSCX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2008

0.95

Over the past year, the correlation between WWSIX and LSSCX has dropped to 0.71 - well below their long-term average of 0.95, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WWSIX vs. LSSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WWSIX
WWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
WWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
WWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

LSSCX
LSSCX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LSSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WWSIX vs. LSSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional (WWSIX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WWSIXLSSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.29

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.49

2.97

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.01

9.29

+8.72

WWSIX vs. LSSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the LSSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWSIX and LSSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WWSIX vs. LSSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWSIX drawdown since its inception was -59.71%, which is greater than LSSCX's maximum drawdown of -54.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWSIX and LSSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WWSIXLSSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.71%

-54.28%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-9.89%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.17%

-25.10%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.17%

-25.10%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.11%

-44.65%

-0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.20%

-1.43%

-4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-7.55%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.97%

+0.13%

Volatility

WWSIX vs. LSSCX - Volatility Comparison

Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional (WWSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) at 3.22%. This indicates that WWSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WWSIXLSSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

3.22%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

11.72%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

17.17%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

20.77%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

22.34%

+1.33%

WWSIX vs. LSSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WWSIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSCX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

WWSIX vs. LSSCX - Dividend Comparison

WWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, less than LSSCX's 14.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
14.51%17.50%10.71%20.30%12.74%19.01%8.04%8.65%17.43%12.58%8.27%11.35%
WWSIX
Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional
5.98%7.72%28.12%3.00%1.85%5.58%0.20%4.70%14.34%8.83%9.05%18.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


WWSIX and LSSCX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WWSIX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to LSSCX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWSIX dropped -59.71% vs LSSCX's -54.28%.

WWSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WWSIX and LSSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer