PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WWR vs. UMI.BR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WWR vs. UMI.BR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) and Umicore SA (UMI.BR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WWR is traded in USD, while UMI.BR is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UMI.BR values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWR achieves a -30.73% return, which is significantly lower than UMI.BR's 37.92% return.


WWR

1D
-4.68%
1M
-21.28%
YTD
-30.73%
6M
-49.56%
1Y
1.96%
3Y*
-14.88%
5Y*
-34.65%
10Y*

UMI.BR

1D
-4.06%
1M
19.20%
YTD
37.92%
6M
61.18%
1Y
158.39%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
-11.71%
10Y*
3.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWR vs. UMI.BR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WWR
Westwater Resources, Inc.
-30.73%5.87%25.40%-28.49%-63.26%-56.39%133.65%-69.86%-86.92%-18.94%
UMI.BR
Umicore SA
37.92%110.25%-60.60%-22.94%-7.74%-13.98%-0.73%25.12%-14.44%26.68%

Correlation

The correlation between WWR and UMI.BR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2017

0.15

The correlation between WWR and UMI.BR shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WWR vs. UMI.BR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWR
WWR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
WWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
WWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

UMI.BR
UMI.BR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
UMI.BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWR vs. UMI.BR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) and Umicore SA (UMI.BR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WWRUMI.BRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.51

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

5.01

-4.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.03

12.37

-12.33

WWR vs. UMI.BR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the UMI.BR Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWR and UMI.BR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WWRUMI.BRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

3.12

-3.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

-0.29

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

0.10

-0.51

Drawdowns

WWR vs. UMI.BR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWR drawdown since its inception was -99.48%, which is greater than UMI.BR's maximum drawdown of -87.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWR and UMI.BR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WWRUMI.BRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.48%

-87.19%

-12.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.07%

-31.01%

-54.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-85.07%

-72.13%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.42%

-87.19%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.33%

-53.08%

-46.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.22%

-30.24%

-60.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.33%

12.65%

+47.68%

Volatility

WWR vs. UMI.BR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) is 14.29%, while Umicore SA (UMI.BR) has a volatility of 20.03%. This indicates that WWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMI.BR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WWRUMI.BRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.29%

20.03%

-5.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.86%

36.17%

+18.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

114.74%

49.86%

+64.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.67%

40.32%

+42.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.20%

37.53%

+66.67%

Dividends

WWR vs. UMI.BR - Dividend Comparison

WWR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMI.BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UMI.BR
Umicore SA
2.05%1.40%8.04%3.21%2.33%2.10%0.64%1.79%2.08%1.30%2.40%2.59%
WWR
Westwater Resources, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

WWR vs. UMI.BR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Westwater Resources, Inc. and Umicore SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. WWR values in USD, UMI.BR values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


WWR and UMI.BR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WWR and UMI.BR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer