PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WULX vs. CIFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WULX vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF (WULX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WULX achieves a 238.07% return, which is significantly higher than CIFG's 92.34% return.


WULX

1D
-2.27%
1M
29.01%
YTD
238.07%
6M
98.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CIFG

1D
-0.35%
1M
94.51%
YTD
92.34%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WULX vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WULX
Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF
238.07%-50.59%
CIFG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF
92.34%-42.39%

Correlation

The correlation between WULX and CIFG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.86

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WULX vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF (WULX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WULX vs. CIFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WULXCIFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

0.12

+1.19

Drawdowns

WULX vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WULX drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, smaller than the maximum CIFG drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULX and CIFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WULXCIFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.48%

-71.71%

+11.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.75%

-0.35%

-4.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.68%

-38.01%

+7.33%

Volatility

WULX vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WULXCIFGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

189.30%

203.83%

-14.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

189.30%

203.83%

-14.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

189.30%

203.83%

-14.53%

WULX vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WULX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

WULX vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison

Neither WULX nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WULX and CIFG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for WULX.

WULX and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for WULX and 0.75% for CIFG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WULX and CIFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer