WULX vs. CIFG
WULX (Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WULX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.
Performance
WULX vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WULX achieves a 238.07% return, which is significantly higher than CIFG's 92.34% return.
WULX
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 29.01%
- YTD
- 238.07%
- 6M
- 98.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 94.51%
- YTD
- 92.34%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WULX vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WULX Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF | 238.07% | -50.59% |
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 92.34% | -42.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between WULX and CIFG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WULX vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF (WULX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WULX | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.12 | +1.19 |
Drawdowns
WULX vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WULX drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, smaller than the maximum CIFG drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULX and CIFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WULX | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.48% | -71.71% | +11.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.75% | -0.35% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.68% | -38.01% | +7.33% |
Volatility
WULX vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WULX | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 189.30% | 203.83% | -14.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 189.30% | 203.83% | -14.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 189.30% | 203.83% | -14.53% |
WULX vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WULX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
WULX vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison
Neither WULX nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WULX and CIFG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for WULX.
WULX and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for WULX and 0.75% for CIFG.
Find the right allocation for WULX and CIFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer