WTV vs. EQRR
WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) and EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. WTV is actively managed, while EQRR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WTV returned 13.53%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for EQRR. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WTV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQRR.
Performance
WTV vs. EQRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTV achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than EQRR's 27.06% return.
WTV
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 23.03%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- —
EQRR
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 27.06%
- 6M
- 25.94%
- 1Y
- 38.66%
- 3Y*
- 22.17%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- —
WTV vs. EQRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund | 9.70% | 13.51% | 23.99% | 22.35% | -8.06% | 30.59% | 6.15% | 29.69% | -8.29% | 1.58% |
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 27.06% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | -10.14% | 19.57% | -18.60% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTV and EQRR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between WTV and EQRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
WTV vs. EQRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WTV
EQRR
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
WTV
EQRR
Technology
WTV
EQRR
Consumer Cyclical
WTV
EQRR
Industrials
WTV
EQRR
Consumer Defensive
WTV
EQRR
-
Healthcare
WTV
EQRR
-
Communication Services
WTV
EQRR
Energy
WTV
EQRR
Real Estate
WTV
EQRR
-
Utilities
WTV
EQRR
-
Basic Materials
WTV
EQRR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTV vs. EQRR — Risk / Return Rank
WTV
EQRR
WTV vs. EQRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) and ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WTV | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.48 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 7.85 | -4.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | 27.39 | -16.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WTV vs. EQRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTV drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, smaller than the maximum EQRR drawdown of -57.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTV and EQRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTV | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.18% | -57.93% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -4.95% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -17.75% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.30% | -21.75% | +2.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | -0.86% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -10.03% | +5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 1.42% | +0.78% |
Volatility
WTV vs. EQRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) is 3.64%, while ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that WTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTV | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 7.03% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.20% | 11.56% | -3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.92% | 14.50% | -2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 21.40% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 24.87% | -4.70% |
WTV vs. EQRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EQRR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTV vs. EQRR - Dividend Comparison
WTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than EQRR's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.21% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% |
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund | 1.66% | 1.59% | 1.54% | 1.62% | 2.08% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.44% | 1.94% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTV and EQRR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQRR has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to WTV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTV dropped -42.18% vs EQRR's -57.93%.
On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.53% vs 13.17% for EQRR. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 13.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQRR.
WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.21% for EQRR.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for WTV and 0.35% for EQRR.
EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTV and EQRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer