PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTS vs. CEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WTS vs. CEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTS achieves a 21.12% return, which is significantly higher than CEG's -27.96% return.


WTS

1D
3.81%
1M
11.26%
YTD
21.12%
6M
19.78%
1Y
38.75%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
19.38%
10Y*
20.25%

CEG

1D
2.86%
1M
-7.54%
YTD
-27.96%
6M
-27.70%
1Y
-15.08%
3Y*
40.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTS vs. CEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
21.12%36.85%-1.62%43.57%-5.89%
CEG
Constellation Energy Corp
-27.96%58.80%92.71%37.24%73.87%

Correlation

The correlation between WTS and CEG is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022

0.27

The correlation between WTS and CEG shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WTS:

$11.16B

CEG:

$89.83B

EPS

WTS:

$10.95

CEG:

$8.13

PE Ratio

WTS:

30.43

CEG:

31.23

PEG Ratio

WTS:

1.42

CEG:

0.54

PS Ratio

WTS:

4.36

CEG:

3.31

PB Ratio

WTS:

5.32

CEG:

2.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

WTS:

$2.56B

CEG:

$24.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WTS:

$1.26B

CEG:

$20.98B

EBITDA (TTM)

WTS:

$556.30M

CEG:

$5.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTS vs. CEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTS
WTS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
WTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
WTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CEG
CEG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTS vs. CEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTSCEGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.98

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

-0.38

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

-0.78

+7.29

WTS vs. CEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the CEG Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTS and CEG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTS vs. CEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTS drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than CEG's maximum drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTS and CEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTSCEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.68%

-50.70%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.45%

-39.77%

+24.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.54%

-50.70%

+31.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-36.93%

+36.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.19%

-11.67%

-4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

19.38%

-13.41%

Volatility

WTS vs. CEG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) is 7.01%, while Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) has a volatility of 15.26%. This indicates that WTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTSCEGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

15.26%

-8.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.66%

37.72%

-21.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

46.66%

-23.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.84%

49.38%

-21.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.24%

49.38%

-21.14%

Dividends

WTS vs. CEG - Dividend Comparison

WTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than CEG's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEG
Constellation Energy Corp
0.64%0.44%0.63%0.97%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
0.66%0.72%0.81%0.66%0.79%0.52%0.76%0.90%1.27%0.99%1.09%1.33%

Financials

WTS vs. CEG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Constellation Energy Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
677.30M
6.07B
(WTS) Total Revenue
(CEG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WTS vs. CEG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Constellation Energy Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
48.2%
40.8%
Portfolio components
WTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.10M and revenue of 677.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

CEG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 6.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.

WTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 133.00M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.

CEG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported an operating income of 598.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

WTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 99.60M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

CEG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WTS and CEG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CEG has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to WTS (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTS dropped -63.68% vs CEG's -50.70%.

WTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTS and CEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer