WTMU vs. AGQ
WTMU (WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF) and AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - WTMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while AGQ is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). WTMU is actively managed, while AGQ is passively managed. Over the past year, WTMU returned 5.96% vs 142.76% for AGQ. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. WTMU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AGQ.
Performance
WTMU vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTMU achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -30.83% return.
WTMU
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGQ
- 1D
- -5.25%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -30.83%
- 6M
- -5.75%
- 1Y
- 142.76%
- 3Y*
- 54.17%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
WTMU vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WTMU WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF | 0.45% | 5.09% |
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -30.83% | 304.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTMU and AGQ is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTMU vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank
WTMU
AGQ
WTMU vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTMU | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.32 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 1.88 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.25 | 3.59 | +2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTMU | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 1.19 | +1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.08 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
WTMU vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTMU drawdown since its inception was -4.24%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMU and AGQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTMU | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -98.16% | +93.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.72% | -76.21% | +73.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -76.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -76.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -85.31% | +83.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -79.86% | +79.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 39.92% | -38.96% |
Volatility
WTMU vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) is 0.74%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 33.51%. This indicates that WTMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTMU | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 33.51% | -32.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.77% | 133.70% | -131.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22% | 120.79% | -118.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 74.68% | -69.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 65.66% | -60.90% |
WTMU vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTMU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTMU vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
WTMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, while AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTMU WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF | 2.98% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTMU and AGQ have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGQ has higher volatility (33.51%) compared to WTMU (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMU dropped -4.24% vs AGQ's -98.16%.
On 1-year performance, AGQ leads with 142.76% vs 5.96% for WTMU. On fees, WTMU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, WTMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AGQ has performed better with a 142.76% return vs 5.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTMU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for AGQ.
WTMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.00% for AGQ.
WTMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while AGQ is Silver. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WTMU and 0.93% for AGQ.
WTMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTMU and AGQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer