WTMF vs. QTR
WTMF (WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and QTR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTMF is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while QTR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTMF returned 9.88%/yr vs 22.69%/yr for QTR. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTMF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QTR.
Performance
WTMF vs. QTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than QTR's 17.06% return.
WTMF
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- 3.26%
QTR
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 8.60%
- YTD
- 17.06%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTMF vs. QTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 8.39% | 12.17% | 3.20% | 16.72% | -6.52% | -1.43% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 17.06% | 14.52% | 21.46% | 45.53% | -29.94% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTMF and QTR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.38 |
WTMF vs. QTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WTMF
QTR
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
WTMF
QTR
Technology
WTMF
QTR
Healthcare
WTMF
QTR
Financial Services
WTMF
QTR
Consumer Cyclical
WTMF
QTR
Real Estate
WTMF
QTR
Energy
WTMF
QTR
Basic Materials
WTMF
QTR
Utilities
WTMF
QTR
Communication Services
WTMF
QTR
Consumer Defensive
WTMF
QTR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTMF vs. QTR — Risk / Return Rank
WTMF
QTR
WTMF vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTMF | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.40 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.55 | 2.68 | +2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.79 | 9.19 | +15.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTMF | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.33 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.68 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
WTMF vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, roughly equal to the maximum QTR drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and QTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTMF | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -31.72% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.04% | -12.29% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.93% | -18.99% | +9.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.73% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.70% | -8.83% | -8.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 3.57% | -2.67% |
Volatility
WTMF vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 1.62%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTMF | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 4.54% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.82% | 10.67% | -3.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.63% | 14.14% | -5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.46% | 18.09% | -8.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.07% | 18.09% | -10.02% |
WTMF vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTMF vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison
WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than QTR's 16.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 16.04% | 18.77% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.81% | 3.04% | 3.57% | 4.74% | 5.29% | 14.71% | 0.47% | 1.63% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTMF and QTR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTR has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to WTMF (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs QTR's -31.72%.
On 3-year performance, QTR leads with 22.69% vs 9.88% for WTMF. On fees, QTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QTR has performed better with a 22.69% return vs 9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WTMF.
QTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.04%, compared with 2.81% for WTMF.
WTMF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while QTR is Nasdaq-100. WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 0.60% for QTR.
WTMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTMF and QTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer