PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTLTX vs. WTMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTLTX vs. WTMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Global All Cap Fund (WTMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTLTX achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than WTMVX's 12.37% return. Over the past 10 years, WTLTX has underperformed WTMVX with an annualized return of 4.68%, while WTMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.90% annualized return.


WTLTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.62%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
4.68%

WTMVX

1D
0.30%
1M
4.66%
YTD
12.37%
6M
12.88%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTLTX vs. WTMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTLTX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund
1.15%7.97%5.53%12.16%-9.75%3.13%7.31%12.21%-2.19%6.19%
WTMVX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Global All Cap Fund
12.37%9.82%16.27%21.64%-18.70%25.74%2.91%25.37%-8.76%19.55%

Correlation

The correlation between WTLTX and WTMVX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 1988

0.30

Over the past year, WTLTX and WTMVX have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTLTX vs. WTMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTLTX
WTLTX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
WTLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
WTLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

WTMVX
WTMVX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
WTMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTLTX vs. WTMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Global All Cap Fund (WTMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTLTXWTMVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.13

1.49

+1.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.97

2.23

+2.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.27

+0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

1.88

+1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.92

7.85

+9.08

WTLTX vs. WTMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTLTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the WTMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTLTX and WTMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTLTXWTMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

1.49

+1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.58

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.59

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.51

+0.57

Drawdowns

WTLTX vs. WTMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTLTX drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, smaller than the maximum WTMVX drawdown of -52.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTLTX and WTMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTLTXWTMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-52.59%

+14.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.76%

-10.58%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.12%

-20.66%

+17.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.35%

-26.82%

+13.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.97%

-35.43%

+18.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-7.61%

+4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

2.54%

-2.18%

Volatility

WTLTX vs. WTMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) is 0.55%, while Segall Bryant & Hamill Global All Cap Fund (WTMVX) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that WTLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTLTXWTMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

4.20%

-3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

10.64%

-9.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96%

13.24%

-11.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.32%

17.08%

-12.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

16.71%

-12.21%

WTLTX vs. WTMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTLTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than WTMVX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTLTX vs. WTMVX - Dividend Comparison

WTLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than WTMVX's 5.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WTLTX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund
4.10%4.09%4.21%4.26%4.23%3.41%3.88%4.88%4.76%4.55%4.51%5.33%
WTMVX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Global All Cap Fund
5.10%5.73%5.66%3.45%2.21%6.13%20.59%8.47%6.77%5.07%4.75%11.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTLTX and WTMVX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTMVX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to WTLTX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTLTX dropped -38.46% vs WTMVX's -52.59%.

WTLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTLTX and WTMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer