WTLTX vs. WISGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX).
WTLTX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Jun 1, 1988. WISGX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Dec 20, 2013.
Performance
WTLTX vs. WISGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WTLTX vs. WISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTLTX Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund | -1.02% | 7.97% | 5.53% | 12.16% | -9.75% | 3.13% | 7.31% | 12.21% | -2.19% | 6.19% |
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | -2.24% | 6.85% | 15.75% | 18.32% | -32.48% | 11.79% | 57.84% | 28.67% | 3.03% | 26.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTLTX achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly higher than WISGX's -2.24% return. Over the past 10 years, WTLTX has underperformed WISGX with an annualized return of 4.83%, while WISGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.62% annualized return.
WTLTX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 5.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.83%
WISGX
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- -9.91%
- YTD
- -2.24%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WTLTX vs. WISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTLTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than WISGX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WTLTX vs. WISGX — Risk / Return Rank
WTLTX
WISGX
WTLTX vs. WISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTLTX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 0.70 | +1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 1.13 | +1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.15 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 1.02 | +0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | 3.98 | +5.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTLTX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 0.70 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.04 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.07 | 0.53 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.42 | +0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between WTLTX and WISGX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WTLTX vs. WISGX - Dividend Comparison
WTLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, while WISGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTLTX Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund | 3.80% | 4.09% | 4.21% | 4.26% | 4.23% | 3.41% | 3.88% | 4.88% | 4.76% | 4.55% | 4.51% | 5.33% |
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 29.83% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
WTLTX vs. WISGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTLTX drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, smaller than the maximum WISGX drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTLTX and WISGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTLTX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.46% | -43.22% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -14.26% | +11.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.35% | -43.22% | +29.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.97% | -43.22% | +26.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -12.48% | +10.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -12.69% | +9.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 3.66% | -3.13% |
Volatility
WTLTX vs. WISGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) is 1.07%, while Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) has a volatility of 8.07%. This indicates that WTLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WTLTX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 8.07% | -7.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.53% | 14.92% | -13.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74% | 24.02% | -21.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 24.39% | -20.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.52% | 23.89% | -19.37% |