WTMVX vs. SBASX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WTMVX (Segall Bryant & Hamill Global All Cap Fund) and SBASX (Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund) are both mutual funds - WTMVX is a Global Equities fund managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill, while SBASX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. Over the past 5 years, WTMVX returned 10.22%/yr vs 7.40%/yr for SBASX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WTMVX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for SBASX.

Performance

WTMVX vs. SBASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Global All Cap Fund (WTMVX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMVX achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly lower than SBASX's 14.87% return.

WTMVX

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 6.76%
• YTD: 13.81%
• 6M: 14.14%
• 1Y: 20.43%
• 3Y*: 16.84%
• 5Y*: 10.22%
• 10Y*: 10.04%

SBASX

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 3.03%
• YTD: 14.87%
• 6M: 12.80%
• 1Y: 26.11%
• 3Y*: 14.41%
• 5Y*: 7.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTMVX vs. SBASX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WTMVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Global All Cap Fund	13.81%	9.82%	16.27%	21.64%	-18.70%	25.74%	2.91%
SBASX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund	14.87%	3.95%	11.89%	13.96%	-13.13%	23.52%	22.80%

Correlation

The correlation between WTMVX and SBASX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.84

The correlation between WTMVX and SBASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WTMVX vs. SBASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTMVX

WTMVX Risk / Return Rank: 30
WTMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
WTMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
WTMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
WTMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
WTMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

SBASX

SBASX Risk / Return Rank: 35
SBASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SBASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
SBASX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
SBASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SBASX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTMVX vs. SBASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Global All Cap Fund (WTMVX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTMVX	SBASX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.58	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	2.36	-0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.28	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	2.47	-0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.15	8.95	-0.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WTMVX vs. SBASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the SBASX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMVX and SBASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTMVX	SBASX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	1.58	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.38	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.52	0.00

Drawdowns

WTMVX vs. SBASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMVX drawdown since its inception was -52.59%, which is greater than SBASX's maximum drawdown of -34.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMVX and SBASX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTMVX	SBASX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.59%	-34.34%	-18.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.58%	-11.44%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.66%	-26.56%	+5.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.82%	-26.56%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.61%	-8.28%	+0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	3.15%	-0.61%

Volatility

WTMVX vs. SBASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Global All Cap Fund (WTMVX) is 4.31%, while Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that WTMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTMVX	SBASX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	5.29%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.69%	13.25%	-2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.27%	17.86%	-4.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.09%	19.80%	-2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.72%	22.23%	-5.51%

WTMVX vs. SBASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMVX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than SBASX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTMVX vs. SBASX - Dividend Comparison

WTMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than SBASX's 4.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SBASX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund	4.86%	5.58%	5.48%	3.65%	2.10%	18.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WTMVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Global All Cap Fund	5.04%	5.73%	5.66%	3.45%	2.21%	6.13%	20.59%	8.47%	6.77%	5.07%	4.75%	11.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTMVX and SBASX in my portfolio?

WTMVX and SBASX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTMVX or SBASX?

SBASX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to WTMVX (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMVX dropped -52.59% vs SBASX's -34.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.