WTIU vs. NVII

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) and NVII (REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while NVII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. WTIU is passively managed, while NVII is actively managed. Over the past year, WTIU returned 104.76% vs 25.71% for NVII. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. WTIU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVII.

Performance

WTIU vs. NVII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 95.37% return, which is significantly higher than NVII's 12.79% return.

WTIU

• 1D: -4.60%
• 1M: 39.23%
• 6M: 55.77%
• YTD: 95.37%
• 1Y: 104.76%
• 3Y*: -1.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -5.73%

NVII

• 1D: 2.60%
• 1M: 7.28%
• 6M: 12.04%
• YTD: 12.79%
• 1Y: 25.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 53.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NVII REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF	$3.11M	$2.83M	$3.97M
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	$1.41M	$930.94K	$851.49K

WTIU vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	95.37%	10.05%
NVII REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF	12.79%	47.63%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and NVII is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

WTIU vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 55
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 44

NVII

NVII Risk / Return Rank: 32
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 29
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WTIU vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTIU	NVII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	0.70	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	1.14	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.14	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	1.39	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.99	2.88	+2.11

WTIU vs. NVII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIU Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the NVII Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIU and NVII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, which is greater than NVII's maximum drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and NVII.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTIU	NVII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.73%	-18.56%	-57.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.11%	-18.56%	-29.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.75%	-10.69%	-20.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.20%	-6.48%	-32.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.07%	8.94%	+12.13%

Volatility

WTIU vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a higher volatility of 22.17% compared to REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) at 12.23%. This indicates that WTIU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTIU	NVII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.17%	12.23%	+9.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.97%	28.64%	+29.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.79%	37.15%	+32.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.86%	35.94%	+34.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.86%	35.94%	+34.92%

WTIU vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NVII's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTIU vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison

WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.83%.

Position	TTM	2025
NVII REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF	56.83%	29.17%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTIU and NVII in my portfolio?

WTIU and NVII have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTIU or NVII?

WTIU has higher volatility (22.17%) compared to NVII (12.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIU dropped -75.73% vs NVII's -18.56%.

Which ETF is better, WTIU or NVII?

On 1-year performance, WTIU leads with 104.76% vs 25.71% for NVII. On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NVII has been the lower-risk option at 12.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTIU or NVII?

Over the 1-year period, WTIU has performed better with a 104.76% return vs 25.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTIU or NVII?

WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTIU or NVII?

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 56.83%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.

What is the main difference between WTIU and NVII?

WTIU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVII is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 0.99% for NVII.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.