WTIU vs. NBIG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WTIU is passively managed, while NBIG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. WTIU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.

Performance

WTIU vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 45.60% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 565.40% return.

WTIU

• 1D: 4.63%
• 1M: -24.41%
• YTD: 45.60%
• 6M: 48.75%
• 1Y: 26.54%
• 3Y*: 0.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBIG

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: 60.92%
• YTD: 565.40%
• 6M: 432.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIU vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	45.60%	-3.08%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	565.40%	-59.80%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and NBIG is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

WTIU vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 16
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 17
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 15

NBIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIU vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTIU	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.51	—	—

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, roughly equal to the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTIU	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.73%	-75.83%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.39%	-1.88%	-46.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.18%	-40.91%	+1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WTIU	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.35%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.93%	199.52%	-130.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.83%	199.52%	-128.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.83%	199.52%	-128.69%

WTIU vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTIU vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTIU nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTIU and NBIG in my portfolio?

WTIU and NBIG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WTIU or NBIG?

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTIU or NBIG?

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTIU or NBIG?

WTIU and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WTIU and NBIG?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 0.75% for NBIG.