WTIU vs. IREG
WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) and IREG (Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WTIU is passively managed, while IREG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. WTIU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IREG.
Performance
WTIU vs. IREG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 77.62% return, which is significantly higher than IREG's 18.94% return.
WTIU
- 1D
- -5.44%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 77.62%
- 6M
- 54.36%
- 1Y
- 102.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IREG
- 1D
- -23.93%
- 1M
- -29.10%
- YTD
- 18.94%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU vs. IREG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 77.62% | 5.04% |
IREG Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF | 18.94% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTIU and IREG is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTIU vs. IREG — Risk / Return Rank
WTIU
IREG
WTIU vs. IREG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF (IREG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTIU | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTIU | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.27 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
WTIU vs. IREG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, smaller than the maximum IREG drawdown of -80.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and IREG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTIU | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.73% | -80.08% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.04% | -52.59% | +15.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.18% | -44.11% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.05% | — | — |
Volatility
WTIU vs. IREG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTIU | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.36% | 210.32% | -142.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.60% | 210.32% | -139.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.60% | 210.32% | -139.72% |
WTIU vs. IREG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IREG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTIU vs. IREG - Dividend Comparison
Neither WTIU nor IREG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WTIU and IREG have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IREG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IREG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.
WTIU and IREG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 0.75% for IREG.
Find the right allocation for WTIU and IREG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer