PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTIU vs. IEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTIU vs. IEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 91.57% return, which is significantly higher than IEO's 34.59% return.


WTIU

1D
4.02%
1M
-7.74%
YTD
91.57%
6M
66.33%
1Y
103.25%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
10Y*

IEO

1D
1.66%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
34.59%
6M
26.42%
1Y
40.11%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
18.96%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIU vs. IEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
91.57%-17.13%-29.63%-28.42%
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
34.59%2.15%-1.45%4.25%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and IEO is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023

0.97

The correlation between WTIU and IEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

WTIU vs. IEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WTIU
IEO

Energy

100.0%
99.3%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

WTIU
100.0%
IEO
99.3%

Basic Materials

WTIU

-

IEO
0.7%

Communication Services

WTIU

-

IEO

-

Consumer Cyclical

WTIU

-

IEO

-

Consumer Defensive

WTIU

-

IEO

-

Financial Services

WTIU

-

IEO

-

Healthcare

WTIU

-

IEO

-

Industrials

WTIU

-

IEO

-

Real Estate

WTIU

-

IEO

-

Technology

WTIU

-

IEO

-

Utilities

WTIU

-

IEO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTIU vs. IEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

IEO
IEO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIU vs. IEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTIUIEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.82

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

7.63

-1.08

WTIU vs. IEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIU Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the IEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIU and IEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTIUIEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.61

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.17

-0.26

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. IEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, roughly equal to the maximum IEO drawdown of -79.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and IEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTIUIEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.73%

-79.17%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.11%

-14.30%

-24.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.73%

-31.46%

-44.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.10%

-7.30%

-24.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.19%

-26.27%

-12.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.83%

5.28%

+10.55%

Volatility

WTIU vs. IEO - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a higher volatility of 27.06% compared to iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO) at 9.32%. This indicates that WTIU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTIUIEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.06%

9.32%

+17.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.98%

19.86%

+35.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.51%

25.15%

+42.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.62%

30.54%

+40.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.62%

35.00%

+35.62%

WTIU vs. IEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IEO's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTIU vs. IEO - Dividend Comparison

WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.97%2.61%2.63%3.00%3.77%2.62%3.17%1.85%1.67%0.94%0.98%2.03%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, WTIU and IEO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WTIU has higher volatility (27.06%) compared to IEO (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIU dropped -75.73% vs IEO's -79.17%.

On 3-year performance, IEO leads with 16.01% vs 5.93% for WTIU. On fees, IEO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IEO has been the lower-risk option at 9.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IEO has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.

IEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.

WTIU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IEO is Energy Equities. WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while IEO tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Exploration & Production Index. They also come from different issuers: REX and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 0.42% for IEO.

IEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTIU and IEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer