WTIU vs. CBRG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) and CBRG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WTIU is passively managed, while CBRG is actively managed. Their -0.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. WTIU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CBRG.

Performance

WTIU vs. CBRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF (CBRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WTIU

• 1D: -4.60%
• 1M: 39.23%
• 6M: 55.77%
• YTD: 95.37%
• 1Y: 104.76%
• 3Y*: -1.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -5.73%

CBRG

• 1D: 21.49%
• 1M: -0.81%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CBRG Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF	$53.40M	$44.52M	$39.90M
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	$1.41M	$930.94K	$851.49K

WTIU vs. CBRG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	36.56%
CBRG Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF	-57.33%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and CBRG is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026	-0.00

Return for Risk

WTIU vs. CBRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 55
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CBRG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WTIU vs. CBRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF (CBRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTIU	CBRG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.99	—	—

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. CBRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, roughly equal to the maximum CBRG drawdown of -78.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and CBRG.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTIU	CBRG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.73%	-78.35%	+2.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.75%	-65.00%	+34.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.20%	-24.96%	-14.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WTIU	CBRG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.17%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.97%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.79%	178.34%	-108.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.86%	178.34%	-107.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.86%	178.34%	-107.48%

WTIU vs. CBRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CBRG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTIU vs. CBRG - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTIU nor CBRG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTIU and CBRG in my portfolio?

WTIU and CBRG have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WTIU or CBRG?

On fees, CBRG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTIU or CBRG?

CBRG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTIU or CBRG?

WTIU and CBRG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WTIU and CBRG?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 0.75% for CBRG.