CBRG vs. ASMG

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

CBRG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF) and ASMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

CBRG vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF (CBRG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CBRG

• 1D: -15.15%
• 1M: -24.50%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMG

• 1D: -8.51%
• 1M: -0.74%
• 6M: 92.40%
• YTD: 125.87%
• 1Y: 266.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBRG vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CBRG Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF	-56.98%
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	46.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CBRG and ASMG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026	0.04

Return for Risk

CBRG vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBRG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMG

ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBRG vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF (CBRG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBRG	ASMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.90	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.94	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.59	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	18.62	—

Drawdowns

CBRG vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBRG drawdown since its inception was -74.80%, which is greater than ASMG's maximum drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRG and ASMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBRG	ASMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.80%	-43.95%	-30.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.71%	-21.76%	-42.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.24%	-12.90%	-2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CBRG	ASMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	43.77%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	74.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	151.36%	90.31%	+61.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	151.36%	89.25%	+62.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	151.36%	89.25%	+62.11%

CBRG vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CBRG and ASMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

CBRG vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison

CBRG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	4.96%	11.20%
CBRG Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBRG and ASMG in my portfolio?

CBRG and ASMG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CBRG or ASMG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBRG or ASMG?

CBRG and ASMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBRG or ASMG?

ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 0.00% for CBRG.