WTIP vs. FLSP

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

WTIP (WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund) and FLSP (Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WTIP returned 18.95% vs 16.54% for FLSP. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

WTIP vs. FLSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIP achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly higher than FLSP's 2.12% return.

WTIP

• 1D: -2.14%
• 1M: -10.71%
• YTD: 4.15%
• 6M: 3.35%
• 1Y: 18.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLSP

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 2.12%
• 6M: 2.16%
• 1Y: 16.54%
• 3Y*: 10.38%
• 5Y*: 8.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIP vs. FLSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WTIP WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund	4.15%	13.49%
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF	2.12%	13.80%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIP and FLSP is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

WTIP vs. FLSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIP

WTIP Risk / Return Rank: 33
WTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
WTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
WTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
WTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
WTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 38

FLSP

FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 69
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIP vs. FLSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTIP	FLSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.87	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	2.68	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.32	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	4.12	-2.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.29	12.27	-6.97

WTIP vs. FLSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the FLSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIP and FLSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WTIP vs. FLSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIP drawdown since its inception was -16.52%, smaller than the maximum FLSP drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIP and FLSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTIP	FLSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.52%	-22.75%	+6.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.52%	-4.03%	-12.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.52%	-1.12%	-15.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.98%	-6.25%	+4.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	1.35%	+2.24%

Volatility

WTIP vs. FLSP - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) has a higher volatility of 10.20% compared to Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) at 1.78%. This indicates that WTIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTIP	FLSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.20%	1.78%	+8.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.06%	6.76%	+9.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.26%	9.05%	+8.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.18%	13.35%	+3.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.18%	13.48%	+3.70%

WTIP vs. FLSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WTIP and FLSP have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

WTIP vs. FLSP - Dividend Comparison

WTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than FLSP's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF	2.60%	2.65%	1.18%	1.19%	2.18%	1.19%	8.08%
WTIP WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund	3.08%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTIP and FLSP in my portfolio?

WTIP and FLSP have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTIP or FLSP?

WTIP has higher volatility (10.20%) compared to FLSP (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIP dropped -16.52% vs FLSP's -22.75%.

Which ETF is better, WTIP or FLSP?

On 1-year performance, WTIP leads with 18.95% vs 16.54% for FLSP. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, FLSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTIP or FLSP?

Over the 1-year period, WTIP has performed better with a 18.95% return vs 16.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTIP or FLSP?

WTIP and FLSP have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTIP or FLSP?

WTIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.60% for FLSP.

What is the main difference between WTIP and FLSP?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.