PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTIP vs. BSMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTIP vs. BSMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIP achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than BSMS's 1.11% return.


WTIP

1D
-0.35%
1M
-6.37%
YTD
9.21%
6M
8.54%
1Y
25.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSMS

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.26%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
0.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIP vs. BSMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WTIP and BSMS is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTIP vs. BSMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIP
WTIP Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
WTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMS
BSMS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BSMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIP vs. BSMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTIPBSMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.58

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

3.89

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

10.99

-3.40

WTIP vs. BSMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the BSMS Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIP and BSMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTIP vs. BSMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIP drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, smaller than the maximum BSMS drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIP and BSMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTIPBSMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.46%

-14.95%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.46%

-1.05%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.46%

-0.81%

-11.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-4.94%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

0.37%

+2.94%

Volatility

WTIP vs. BSMS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) at 0.51%. This indicates that WTIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTIPBSMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.81%

0.51%

+9.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.69%

1.01%

+14.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.95%

1.52%

+15.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

3.59%

+13.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

6.18%

+10.72%

WTIP vs. BSMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMS's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTIP vs. BSMS - Dividend Comparison

WTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than BSMS's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSMS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF
3.01%2.79%2.81%2.58%1.56%1.49%1.61%0.46%
WTIP
WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund
2.93%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTIP and BSMS have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTIP has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to BSMS (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIP dropped -12.46% vs BSMS's -14.95%.

On 1-year performance, WTIP leads with 25.03% vs 4.06% for BSMS. On fees, BSMS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMS has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WTIP has performed better with a 25.03% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WTIP.

BSMS has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.93% for WTIP.

WTIP is categorized as Long-Short, while BSMS is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTIP and 0.18% for BSMS.

BSMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTIP and BSMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer