WTID vs. TSLS
WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - WTID tracks the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%) while TSLS tracks the Tesla Inc (--100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTID returned -48.40%/yr vs -38.33%/yr for TSLS. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTID charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for TSLS.
Performance
WTID vs. TSLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -62.23% return, which is significantly lower than TSLS's 3.13% return.
WTID
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -62.23%
- 6M
- -57.99%
- 1Y
- -72.92%
- 3Y*
- -48.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLS
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -8.14%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- -28.79%
- 3Y*
- -38.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTID vs. TSLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -62.23% | -44.50% | -7.93% | -17.12% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.13% | -34.95% | -55.71% | -25.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTID and TSLS is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.08 |
The correlation between WTID and TSLS shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTID vs. TSLS — Risk / Return Rank
WTID
TSLS
WTID vs. TSLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTID | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.92 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.62 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.55 | -0.88 | -0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTID | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | -0.62 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | -0.54 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
WTID vs. TSLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.35%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLS drawdown of -90.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and TSLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTID | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.35% | -90.73% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.12% | -46.42% | -31.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.99% | -84.16% | -4.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.87% | -89.60% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.44% | -63.49% | +9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.10% | 32.85% | +14.25% |
Volatility
WTID vs. TSLS - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a higher volatility of 25.63% compared to Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) at 12.06%. This indicates that WTID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTID | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.63% | 12.06% | +13.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.59% | 27.72% | +25.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.54% | 46.68% | +19.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.34% | 58.76% | +11.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.34% | 58.76% | +11.58% |
WTID vs. TSLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLS's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTID vs. TSLS - Dividend Comparison
WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.39% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% |
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTID and TSLS have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTID has higher volatility (25.63%) compared to TSLS (12.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTID dropped -90.35% vs TSLS's -90.73%.
On 3-year performance, TSLS leads with -38.33% vs -48.40% for WTID. On fees, WTID is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TSLS has been the lower-risk option at 12.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TSLS has performed better with a -38.33% return vs -48.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTID is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLS.
TSLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.
WTID tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%). They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTID and 1.07% for TSLS.
TSLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTID and TSLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer