WTID vs. TSLQ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. WTID is passively managed, while TSLQ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTID returned -47.07%/yr vs -64.56%/yr for TSLQ. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTID charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for TSLQ.

Performance

WTID vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -61.80% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's -1.10% return.

WTID

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -6.34%
• 6M: -56.54%
• YTD: -61.80%
• 1Y: -66.12%
• 3Y*: -47.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSLQ

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -2.23%
• 6M: -1.37%
• YTD: -1.10%
• 1Y: -62.15%
• 3Y*: -64.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTID vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-61.80%	-44.50%	-7.93%	-16.93%
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF	-1.10%	-74.67%	-83.21%	-26.73%

Correlation

The correlation between WTID and TSLQ is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2023	0.06

The correlation between WTID and TSLQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WTID vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTID

WTID Risk / Return Rank: 2
WTID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WTID Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Omega Ratio Rank: 2
WTID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WTID Martin Ratio Rank: 1

TSLQ

TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 3
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTID vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTID	TSLQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.97	-0.70	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.72	-0.87	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.90	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	-0.90	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	-1.14	-0.28

WTID vs. TSLQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTID Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the TSLQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTID and TSLQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WTID vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.35%, smaller than the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and TSLQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTID	TSLQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.35%	-98.73%	+8.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.87%	-69.32%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-87.36%	-97.85%	+10.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.75%	-98.53%	+9.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.40%	-68.04%	+12.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.49%	54.54%	-8.05%

Volatility

WTID vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) is 23.57%, while Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a volatility of 34.45%. This indicates that WTID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTID	TSLQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.57%	34.45%	-10.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.51%	62.84%	-7.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.48%	89.53%	-21.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.61%	94.85%	-24.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.61%	94.85%	-24.24%

WTID vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLQ's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTID vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison

WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF	10.68%	10.56%	4.95%	13.35%	2.56%
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTID and TSLQ in my portfolio?

WTID and TSLQ have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTID or TSLQ?

TSLQ has higher volatility (34.45%) compared to WTID (23.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTID dropped -90.35% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.

Which ETF is better, WTID or TSLQ?

On 3-year performance, WTID leads with -47.07% vs -64.56% for TSLQ. On fees, WTID is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, WTID has been the lower-risk option at 23.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTID or TSLQ?

Over the 3-year period, WTID has performed better with a -47.07% return vs -64.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTID or TSLQ?

WTID is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTID or TSLQ?

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.

What is the main difference between WTID and TSLQ?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTID and 1.17% for TSLQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.