WTID vs. NVII

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and NVII (REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTID is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while NVII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. WTID is passively managed, while NVII is actively managed. Over the past year, WTID returned -66.12% vs 37.08% for NVII. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTID charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVII.

Performance

WTID vs. NVII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -61.80% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 15.17% return.

WTID

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -6.34%
• 6M: -56.54%
• YTD: -61.80%
• 1Y: -66.12%
• 3Y*: -47.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVII

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: 4.97%
• 6M: 15.03%
• YTD: 15.17%
• 1Y: 37.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTID vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-61.80%	-31.44%
NVII REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF	15.17%	47.63%

Correlation

The correlation between WTID and NVII is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

WTID vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTID

WTID Risk / Return Rank: 2
WTID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WTID Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Omega Ratio Rank: 2
WTID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WTID Martin Ratio Rank: 1

NVII

NVII Risk / Return Rank: 37
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 33
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTID vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTID	NVII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.97	1.02	-1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.72	1.51	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.19	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	2.01	-2.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	4.39	-5.81

WTID vs. NVII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTID Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the NVII Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTID and NVII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WTID vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.35%, which is greater than NVII's maximum drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and NVII.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTID	NVII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.35%	-18.56%	-71.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.87%	-18.56%	-56.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-87.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.75%	-8.80%	-79.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.40%	-6.21%	-49.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.49%	8.47%	+38.02%

Volatility

WTID vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a higher volatility of 23.57% compared to REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) at 10.97%. This indicates that WTID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTID	NVII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.57%	10.97%	+12.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.51%	27.86%	+27.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.48%	36.38%	+32.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.61%	35.59%	+35.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.61%	35.59%	+35.02%

WTID vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NVII's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTID vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison

WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.39%.

Position	TTM	2025
NVII REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF	55.39%	29.17%
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTID and NVII in my portfolio?

WTID and NVII have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTID or NVII?

WTID has higher volatility (23.57%) compared to NVII (10.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTID dropped -90.35% vs NVII's -18.56%.

Which ETF is better, WTID or NVII?

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 37.08% vs -66.12% for WTID. On fees, WTID is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NVII has been the lower-risk option at 10.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTID or NVII?

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 37.08% return vs -66.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTID or NVII?

WTID is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTID or NVII?

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 55.39%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.

What is the main difference between WTID and NVII?

WTID is categorized as Inverse Equities, while NVII is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTID and 0.99% for NVII.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.